Whenever decisions don’t seem to make sense, it may always be because of missing information. Over the last year, there have been very many decisions by the D-backs front office that have been hard to understand. A staggering number of them suddenly make sense, though, with a single bit of information: this team has prioritized ground balls. With their recent trades, the evidence has mounted. But ground balls are the key that unlock many of this year’s decisions:

  • In early March, Chase Anderson announced a change to his repertoire; he would commit to his sinker, and start trying to throw his curveball in the zone (generating more contact at the bottom of the zone, instead of whiffs). In hindsight, that may have been how he secured a rotation spot;
  • The pre-season promotion of Nick Ahmed to be the team’s starting shortstop — and the team’s decision to stick with him through a six-week slump to start the season. A couple of weeks into the season, it looked like Ahmed was part of a ground ball plan.
  • Naming Archie Bradley to the starting rotation to start the year. Bradley had had a high ground ball percentage in the minors in 2014, but focused on one (low) part of the strike zone in the early going. In hindsight, he may have pushed Trevor Cahill out of town and earned a starting spot by demonstrating a commitment to inducing ground balls.
  • Andrew Chafin winning a spot in the bullpen. Chafin was a candidate for the rotation longer into spring training than most expected; the team also seemed to give Dan Runzler a number of opportunities to win a lefty matchups role in the bullpen. This was a contest between high-groundball rate pitchers. Chafin featured a 62.3% GB% as a starter in the minors in 2014. Runzler was coming off of a (still high) 53.33% GB%, but it seems like doubling down on that approach may have given him more spring training leash; he finished the 2015 season with a 64.35% GB%.
  • By mid-June, it looked like a number of weird things had happened with rotation members — and that ground balls explained them all. By that point, Rubby De La Rosa, Chase Anderson, Jeremy Hellickson, Randall Delgado and Bradley had all raised their GB% substantially. That doesn’t mean it was working, by the way; a big part of that was pitching down in the zone at a very high rate, with underwhelming results. The team also had quite a few pitchers commit to sinkers in 2015, with mixed pitcher-by-pitcher results.
  • Touki Toussaint was sold in a bizarre trade that sent Bronson Arroyo‘s contract (with buyout clause) to Atlanta. Not saying ground balls explain this whole thing, but part of the process was the D-backs’ evaluation of Toussaint, which seemed less optimistic than many others’. Up through the date of the trade on June 20, 2015, Toussaint had a minor league GB% of just 38.26%. And, this is just speculation, but you also wonder if the missing Toussaint velocity that later returned in Atlanta was lost because Toussaint was tasked at throwing down in the zone or pitching to contact.
  • When a starter was needed in late July, Aaron Blair was passed over in favor of Zack Godley. As Jeff has pointed out repeatedly, Blair is a ground ball pitcher in his own right — 52.21% GB% in 2015 after a 40.86% GB% in 2014 — but Godley has him beat on that count. Godley finished the season with a 54.64% GB% between the majors and minors, all by a dogged commitment to throwing below the strike zone.

There are more, I’m sure. And you can see the appeal in accumulating ground ball pitchers; other than the most outstanding pitchers to put on a D-backs uniform, others of the franchise’s most successful arms have all been ground ball types: Brandon Webb, Byung-Hyun Kim, Brad Ziegler. I wrote a piece a couple of months ago suggesting the team try to build its own Ziegler-esque pitchers, just the way Ziegler came to be Ziegler. Turns out I was way behind this team. They were already working on it.

“Extra arms” that the team has received in trade since Zack Godley‘s MLB debut are eye opening:

Extra Arms

Koch’s ground ball percentage is about average, at least judging by major league standards, but I’m not sure we should view him in the same category; he was probably more than a “throw in” arm in the Addison Reed trade. Junior Garcia, Sam McWilliams, Gabe Speier, and maybe even Miller Diaz, though — those guys were probably just a matter of balancing some scales or justifying a salary dump. In those settings, the D-backs don’t want just anyone. They want your low-minors ground ball guy. Speier’s GB% is crazy. The over 60% rates of McWilliams and Garcia are just downright nasty. Almost Ziegler-esque.

This has probably been going on longer than just a few months; after all, Godley himself was a throw-in to balance scales it what was an obvious salary dump. In exchange for Miguel Montero, the D-backs also got Jeferson Mejia from the Cubs; and although Mejia’s ground ball percentage in 2015 was not very impressive (48.61% GB%), when the D-backs traded for him, they were looking at a pitcher who had recorded a 56.07% GB% in 2014 — just a hair higher than Godley’s 55.8% GB% that season.

The D-backs have signed several dozen minor league pitchers in the last year. Some did not have any data at mlbfarm.com, but I made a spreadsheet out of the last few years’ GB% of the rest (well, of every minor league pitcher acquired). Quite a few of them don’t have very high GB%; it’s not like it can be the only thing they’ve been looking at. But in some cases, it still looks like it’s there. Kyle Drabek, signed to a minors deal last month? Okay, so the team likes former top prospects (and signed Adam Loewen the previous month), but Drabek has posted some very high ground ball rates in the recent past, especially given that he’s started. Brett Shankin looks like he’s a supergroundballer. Hector Martinez didn’t pitch in 2015, but was at 59.3% in 2014. Parker Frazier, Ethan Elias, Oscar Abreu, Jhoan Duran, Julio DePaula… it’s a lot of fringy ground ball stuff used to supplement the minor league system.

Maybe getting a lot of ground ball pitchers in the minors does other things like help infielders develop their defense more quickly — but with Runzler in the recent backdrop, it seems more likely that these are bets that some of these guys can become helpful MLB relievers within the Contention Window. Godley shot through the minors like a rocket despite being a 25-year-old Single-A pitcher. There’s a non-zero chance that some of these guys follow a similar path, and that seems to be the plan. In October, Jeff dug into the number of college relievers that the D-backs have drafted in the last few years, noting that the team has made pitchers’ aging curves an enemy — especially since the organization has tended to move relievers through the system so slowly. Maybe we’ll see that change.

The D-backs went hard after college players in the June draft — extremely hard. We have a ready explanation for that in the Contention Window. But it’s still pretty strange for 90% of your draft picks to be college players — that makes it seem like a plan from which the D-backs only deviated for special circumstances, like with Wesley Rodriguez. Can ground balls explain that, too? Few of these pitchers posted a meaningful number of innings in 2015. Alex Young has only 18 tracked balls — but 9 of them were grounders. Taylor Clarke, the team’s third-rounder, also leaned toward ground balls in a larger-but-still-small sample of 43 batted balls (53.49% GB%). And plenty others — especially those signed soon after the draft — look like they’re being run through a single model. Justin Donatella (59.46% GB%), Cameron Smith, (57.36%), Cameron Gann (54.67%), and Austin Mason (53.25%) were some of the few I saw — and while those rates aren’t off the charts, they’re still very Trevor Cahill-esque. Remember Pierce Romero, in particular. It’s just 43 batted balls like Clarke, but Romero’s ground ball percentage was a ridiculous 83.72% — a pretty overwhelming sign that he’d lean heavily toward ground balls even in a full season.

This whole ground balls thing is the key with which I will try to understand anything strange the D-backs decide to do, at least in the spring and during this coming season. I think it’s pretty clear they’re trying to make it work. Whether it will work is a different story — the results were pretty bad with Josh Collmenter and Chase Anderson, and it didn’t exactly make Jeremy Hellickson better, either. Still, they may have a lot more success with the ground ball strategy in the future — especially if they continue to acquire players for that purpose rather than changing the pitchers they already have.

7 Responses to D-backs Have a Ground Ball Plan, Accumulating Next Generation of Ground Ball Pitchers

  1. coldblueAZ says:

    Maybe we were a little rough on Stew. In any event, I’m hopeful that new pitching coach Mike Butcher will be more effective in handling the staff to improve the GB results. We’ll find out soon.

  2. Bradford says:

    I understand wanting to keep the ball down to avoid XBH’s. It will be interesting to see if the Dbacks’ grounds crew changes the infield grass to accommodate this new pitching philosophy. I heard multiple times via our broadcasters during last season that the Dbacks’ infield is one of the fastest in baseball. Maybe they should try a longer, thicker grass to help our guys out even more.

  3. […] direction. We explored last week how the D-backs are committing to ground balls, and how that ground ball preference manifested itself in minor league signings, in “extra arms” in re…. The D-backs have continued to work in that […]

  4. […] noted last month that the D-backs had been gobbling up minor league pitchers with very high ground ball percentages. Those aren’t necessarily pitchers that will get plugged in after just one or two injuries or […]

  5. […] pitch location, rather than movement. In noting last month that the D-backs had quietly been accumulating a giant wave of ground ball minor leaguers, I ran down the list of events in the last year that all pointed toward ground balls. It’s […]

  6. […] it: he’s an extreme ground ball pitcher, the kind of pitcher the D-backs have gotten as a throw-in in nearly every deal they’ve pulled off since the middle of last summer. Wagner also happens to have done remarkably well in High-A and Double-A in the last two seasons, […]

  7. […] majority of their picks in 2015, the D-backs do have a type. It seems like Tony La Russa has had a ground ball vision for the team, and it almost doesn’t matter whether it was inspired by the success of pitchers […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.